Autocad printing differently than from pdf
- #AUTOCAD PRINTING DIFFERENTLY THAN FROM PDF HOW TO#
- #AUTOCAD PRINTING DIFFERENTLY THAN FROM PDF ZIP FILE#
In this way, the layer properties of the Xref are not copied from its initial drawing. Putting objects on layer 0 and then Xref that drawing into another is not a good practice. Related: Creating and modifying eTransmit package in AutoCAD Making Xref drawings on layer 0:
#AUTOCAD PRINTING DIFFERENTLY THAN FROM PDF ZIP FILE#
To ensure proper transmission of a drawing containing Xref use eTransmit in AutoCAD which creates a zip file of all Xref’s and then this zip can be easily transferred. Sending all Xref manually is not a good idea as it may cause broken file path and missing references. Generally, Xref’s of a drawing are saved on multiple network drives and if you intend to send a drawing containing multiple Xref then eTransmit is the best option. Not using eTransmit for drawing containing Xref: It is also advisable to prefix layer containing Xref with X or Z to keep it at the bottom of layer list. In this way, you can control properties of X-ref’s in a better way and also it becomes easier to manage these external references in drawings where they are inserted. Not putting XREF on a separate layer:Īs far as possible always try to put Xref’s on a separate layer dedicated to only Xref’s and also ensure that the layer is not layer 0. In this way, the blocks take the property of layer on which they are finally put but if they are made on the layer other than layer 0 then they don’t inherit properties from target layer on which they are put which creates an inconsistent drawing. Many drafters use a practice of placing blocks on the layer other than layer 0 but in actual practice, blocks should be created on layer 0. The accidental change of viewport scale may go un-noticed in some cases and this error may appear in drawing information using fields for the viewport scale.
When you are done changing scale of a viewport in paper space then you should always try to lock that viewport to avoid accidental change of its scale. Related: Understanding Annotation scale of AutoCAD Not Locking Viewports in Paperspace: Annotative property in AutoCAD is introduced to get rid of this issue and to make drawing scale transition a seamless task but still, most of the drafters try to avoid using annotative scale despite its great features. Using the different scale of an object for different viewports and putting them on different layers is an obsolete technique.
#AUTOCAD PRINTING DIFFERENTLY THAN FROM PDF HOW TO#
Related: How to convert units of AutoCAD drawing Not using annotative scales: Although you can change units of a drawing in AutoCAD at a later stage but it is always advisable to start with a template with all of these pre-set settings to avoid confusion at a later stage. This one is another such bad practice where users tend to start drawing without specifying units or limits of the drawing. Sometimes not all of the drawing objects are placed on the correct layer, as an example not placing all of the doors in a drawing on its layer and other similar situations. This issue can simply be avoided by reviewing drawing before submission. If consistent standards are not followed, then you might end up with drawings having different naming standards that need to be translated before it can be used properly thus killing extra work hours. This ensures consistency when drawing is transferred to other contractors. Not using layering standards:Īs far as possible try to use the layering standards such as AIA or your company standard. This is simply a bad practice which is seen in a novice or a lazy drafter and it should also be avoided wherever possible. Why would you do that? AutoCAD offers a great way of sorting drawing elements using layers which can also help you in controlling properties of multiple objects by changing properties of their corresponding layer. Once you assign the object properties and then assign those objects to any layer the properties of the object are retained and it does not inherit property from its layer thus creating a great deal of confusion and untidy drawing. Not assigning object properties by layer:Īs the title suggests the practice of assigning properties to the object is not a good one. Related: Why you should not use Defpoints layer. I have shared some good reasons for avoiding this bad practice in this related article. The users generally tend to put objects which they don’t want to plot on Defpoints layer. This is one particular bad practice which is prevalent in veteran CAD users. Many of the responses were similar, so I have only included the most common among the similar type of bad practices. I have compiled their responses along with some inputs from me in this article. I got some really great responses, big thanks to all users for sharing their answers. Recently I asked my blog subscribers and LinkedIn connections about the AutoCAD bad practices which they come across in their workplace.